Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 205 Jack Chambers voters.
33% Yes |
67% No |
23% Yes |
63% No |
9% Yes, but deny after three crimes |
2% No, and criminals should not receive free legal aid |
2% No, deny after first crime |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 205 Jack Chambers voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 205 Jack Chambers voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Jack Chambers voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NN42LJ7mos7MO
Yes, but deny if the repeat offences are violent or serious crimes. Misdemeanors like possession should not effect this.
@8SW57DK4yrs4Y
Yes - Innocent until proven guilty
@8QVLH9S4yrs4Y
yes, but not for sexual and violent crimes.
@8S537334yrs4Y
@9ZW57PD1mo1MO
Yes, but deny after three crimes, and it depends on the severity of the crime as well (eg: sexual assault, murder, etc)
@9ZW3T2V1mo1MO
yes with limits on the amount of offences they have committed and the levels of crime, with more legal support for integrating back into society
@9ZTP7261mo1MO
In relation to drug offences, I do believe people should be offered help or guidance in the right direction to find help, but in general I think this question is too vague on the topic of repeat offenders.
@9ZTMQLQ1mo1MO
Depends on the type of crime. If a very serious and severe or violent crime then no but young people or first time offenders should have assess
Join in on the most popular conversations.
