Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 3.3k Beggarsbush voters.
47% Yes |
53% No |
38% Yes |
51% No |
9% Yes, but deny after three crimes |
2% No, deny after first crime |
0% No, and criminals should not receive free legal aid |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.3k Beggarsbush voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 3.3k Beggarsbush voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Beggarsbush voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NN42LJ6mos6MO
Yes, but deny if the repeat offences are violent or serious crimes. Misdemeanors like possession should not effect this.
@8SW57DK4yrs4Y
Yes - Innocent until proven guilty
@8QVLH9S4yrs4Y
yes, but not for sexual and violent crimes.
@8S537334yrs4Y
@9ZLSMTT1wk1W
I think it's important to see how willing they are to change, and of course it would depend on the severity of the crimes committed
@9ZJJB6S2wks2W
Depending on the crime petty crime might be due to lack of education/ background issues only henious crimes shouldn’t be given help
@9ZHWK9W2wks2W
Depending on the severity of the crime. Minor crimes, the offender should be allowed free legal aid. Offenders committing acts such as rape, murder, domestic abuse ect, should not be entitled to free legal aid.
@9ZH47J42wks2W
If the accused cannot afford their own lawyer, then absolutely. Everyone should have the right to counsel, whether previously convicted of a crime or not.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
