Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 939 Moyashel and Maheradermon voters.
40% Yes |
60% No |
30% Yes |
56% No |
10% Yes, but deny after three crimes |
3% No, deny after first crime |
1% No, and criminals should not receive free legal aid |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 939 Moyashel and Maheradermon voters.
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 939 Moyashel and Maheradermon voters.
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Moyashel and Maheradermon voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NN42LJ10mos10MO
Yes, but deny if the repeat offences are violent or serious crimes. Misdemeanors like possession should not effect this.
@8SW57DK4yrs4Y
Yes - Innocent until proven guilty
@8QVLH9S4yrs4Y
yes, but not for sexual and violent crimes.
@8S537334yrs4Y
@9ZTP7264mos4MO
In relation to drug offences, I do believe people should be offered help or guidance in the right direction to find help, but in general I think this question is too vague on the topic of repeat offenders.
@9ZTMQLQ4mos4MO
Depends on the type of crime. If a very serious and severe or violent crime then no but young people or first time offenders should have assess
@9ZTF4KK4mos4MO
All depends on the crime and why it was committed. For example an addict who keeps reoffending is only reoffending to feed a habit. If they are minor offences they should be entitled to help. In an ideal world they would be offered rehabilitation over punishment.
@9Z957JK5mos5MO
I do believe that everyone deserves free legal aid, however, if the person in question is a repeat offender and shows no signs for change, then the thought of reconsideration would stand to a certain extent
Join in on the most popular conversations.
