Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 5.4k Castleknock voters.
45% Yes |
55% No |
34% Yes |
52% No |
11% Yes, but deny after three crimes |
2% No, deny after first crime |
1% No, and criminals should not receive free legal aid |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 5.4k Castleknock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 5.4k Castleknock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Castleknock voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NN42LJ9mos9MO
Yes, but deny if the repeat offences are violent or serious crimes. Misdemeanors like possession should not effect this.
@8SW57DK4yrs4Y
Yes - Innocent until proven guilty
@8QVLH9S4yrs4Y
yes, but not for sexual and violent crimes.
@8S537334yrs4Y
@9ZW57PD3mos3MO
Yes, but deny after three crimes, and it depends on the severity of the crime as well (eg: sexual assault, murder, etc)
@9ZW3T2V3mos3MO
yes with limits on the amount of offences they have committed and the levels of crime, with more legal support for integrating back into society
@9ZTP7263mos3MO
In relation to drug offences, I do believe people should be offered help or guidance in the right direction to find help, but in general I think this question is too vague on the topic of repeat offenders.
@9ZTMQLQ3mos3MO
Depends on the type of crime. If a very serious and severe or violent crime then no but young people or first time offenders should have assess
Join in on the most popular conversations.
