Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 1.9k Finglas North B voters.
46% Yes |
54% No |
34% Yes |
51% No |
12% Yes, but deny after three crimes |
2% No, deny after first crime |
1% No, and criminals should not receive free legal aid |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.9k Finglas North B voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.9k Finglas North B voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Finglas North B voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9NN42LJ10mos10MO
Yes, but deny if the repeat offences are violent or serious crimes. Misdemeanors like possession should not effect this.
@8SW57DK4yrs4Y
Yes - Innocent until proven guilty
@8QVLH9S4yrs4Y
yes, but not for sexual and violent crimes.
@8S537334yrs4Y
@9ZTP7264mos4MO
In relation to drug offences, I do believe people should be offered help or guidance in the right direction to find help, but in general I think this question is too vague on the topic of repeat offenders.
@9ZTMQLQ4mos4MO
Depends on the type of crime. If a very serious and severe or violent crime then no but young people or first time offenders should have assess
@9ZTF4KK4mos4MO
All depends on the crime and why it was committed. For example an addict who keeps reoffending is only reoffending to feed a habit. If they are minor offences they should be entitled to help. In an ideal world they would be offered rehabilitation over punishment.
@9Z957JK5mos5MO
I do believe that everyone deserves free legal aid, however, if the person in question is a repeat offender and shows no signs for change, then the thought of reconsideration would stand to a certain extent
Join in on the most popular conversations.
