+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 143 Nordic Model voters.

6%
Yes
94%
No
6%
Yes
87%
No
0%
Yes, assuming checks and balances are in place
6%
No, and AI should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives
1%
No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI yet

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 143 Nordic Model voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 143 Nordic Model voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Nordic Model voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZBMJLCanswered…2wks2W

No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI and AI shouldn't make life changing decisions

 @9Z9B9Y4answered…2wks2W

I think AI would give an unbiased opinion but also have it more or less regulated by a judge as well if human factors like emotion and understanding back story need to come into play

 @9YNDWDVanswered…2wks2W

Absolutely not, that is insane. perhaps in the future it could be used as an aid but life altering decisions should be made by educated humans

 @9YM7NHXanswered…2wks2W

Yes, but there should be a human Quality Assurance team that revises the decisions for errors, at least until another AI can do the revisions.

 @9TK4TV9answered…2mos2MO

 @9SZSJTTanswered…3mos3MO

If we invent true AGI, then it must only used as an aid for judges to make decisions, current iteration should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives.

 @9P6TG3Manswered…5mos5MO

Yes - but only if it can be proveen to be 100% authentic and provides non-repudiation within court

 @9NW733Qanswered…6mos6MO