This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Ideology
Province
County
Region
Barony
Response rates from 178 Green Party voters.
2% Yes |
98% No |
1% Yes |
93% No |
1% Yes, assuming checks and balances are in place |
4% No, and AI should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives |
2% No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI yet |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 178 Green Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 178 Green Party voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Green Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZBMJLC2wks2W
No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI and AI shouldn't make life changing decisions
@9Z9B9Y42wks2W
I think AI would give an unbiased opinion but also have it more or less regulated by a judge as well if human factors like emotion and understanding back story need to come into play
@9YNDWDV2wks2W
Absolutely not, that is insane. perhaps in the future it could be used as an aid but life altering decisions should be made by educated humans
@9YM7NHX2wks2W
Yes, but there should be a human Quality Assurance team that revises the decisions for errors, at least until another AI can do the revisions.
@9TK4TV92mos2MO
AI has a role but it a human should approve the final decision
@9SZSJTT3mos3MO
If we invent true AGI, then it must only used as an aid for judges to make decisions, current iteration should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives.
@9P6TG3M5mos5MO
Yes - but only if it can be proveen to be 100% authentic and provides non-repudiation within court
@9NW733Q5mos5MO
Yes, but (as in healthcare) not as the only source for decision making
Join in on the most popular conversations.
