This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
@9ZBMJLC3mos3MO
No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI and AI shouldn't make life changing decisions
@9YNDWDV3mos3MO
Absolutely not, that is insane. perhaps in the future it could be used as an aid but life altering decisions should be made by educated humans
@9YM7NHX3mos3MO
Yes, but there should be a human Quality Assurance team that revises the decisions for errors, at least until another AI can do the revisions.
@9TK4TV95mos5MO
AI has a role but it a human should approve the final decision
@9SZSJTT5mos5MO
If we invent true AGI, then it must only used as an aid for judges to make decisions, current iteration should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives.
@9P6TG3M8mos8MO
Yes - but only if it can be proveen to be 100% authentic and provides non-repudiation within court
@9NW733Q8mos8MO
Yes, but (as in healthcare) not as the only source for decision making
@9N6WBSJ8mos8MO
yes if can aid as evidence in a trial to prove guilt or innocence but only as a last resort
@9N3PTHM8mos8MO
AI should provide recommendations available for public on every decision.
@9Z9B9Y43mos3MO
I think AI would give an unbiased opinion but also have it more or less regulated by a judge as well if human factors like emotion and understanding back story need to come into play
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
