This considers the use of AI algorithms to assist in making decisions such as sentencing, parole, and law enforcement. Proponents argue that it can improve efficiency and reduce human biases. Opponents argue that it may perpetuate existing biases and lacks accountability.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Province
Constituency
County
Region
Barony
Response rates from 156 Left-Wing Nationalism voters.
4% Yes |
96% No |
3% Yes |
88% No |
2% Yes, assuming checks and balances are in place |
6% No, and AI should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives |
2% No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI yet |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 156 Left-Wing Nationalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 156 Left-Wing Nationalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Left-Wing Nationalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZBMJLC3wks3W
No, I don't trust the accuracy of AI and AI shouldn't make life changing decisions
@9YNDWDV3wks3W
Absolutely not, that is insane. perhaps in the future it could be used as an aid but life altering decisions should be made by educated humans
@9YM7NHX3wks3W
Yes, but there should be a human Quality Assurance team that revises the decisions for errors, at least until another AI can do the revisions.
@9TK4TV92mos2MO
AI has a role but it a human should approve the final decision
@9SZSJTT3mos3MO
If we invent true AGI, then it must only used as an aid for judges to make decisions, current iteration should never be used to make decisions that will drastically affect lives.
@9P6TG3M6mos6MO
Yes - but only if it can be proveen to be 100% authentic and provides non-repudiation within court
@9NW733Q6mos6MO
Yes, but (as in healthcare) not as the only source for decision making
@9N6WBSJ6mos6MO
yes if can aid as evidence in a trial to prove guilt or innocence but only as a last resort
Join in on the most popular conversations.
