Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Response rates from 1.5k Liberalism voters.
48% Yes |
52% No |
48% Yes |
52% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.5k Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.5k Liberalism voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Liberalism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZDJ3XW2wks2W
Instead of putting tighter restrictions on diesel there should be more research into other types of cleaner fuel that can be used. Example biodiesel
@9ZCWX9L2wks2W
Drivers should not be penalized when current public transportation is so unreliable that it can’t be trusted to get anywhere on time
@9ZK3D2P2wks2W
No you can not force people and some people may not have the money . Do it only if your going to help buy the cars
@9ZJS8BP2wks2W
Not until we provide the services in order to maintain and charge eco friendly cars wich needs to be increased.
@9ZJKV8Z2wks2W
A lot of funding needs to be put into rural public transportation and subsidies for electric vehicles before increasing the cost for older vehicles
@9ZJ82TP2wks2W
Yes, but if an alternative is provided for citizens who cannot afford to switch from a diesel vehicle
@9ZHSLPP2wks2W
Only if they can develop decent schemes to help the working class afford electric vehicles and charger installation
@9ZH4MH82wks2W
In a domestic setting it should be quite strict but applying restrictions commercially is not foreseeably viable
Join in on the most popular conversations.
