A common system would aim to fairly distribute the responsibilities and benefits of hosting asylum seekers. Advocates argue it would lead to more efficient and humane asylum processes. Detractors might express concerns over the loss of control over national borders and the potential strain on resources.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Constituency
County
Region
Barony
Electoral Division
Response rates from 209 Coolock voters.
76% Yes |
24% No |
76% Yes |
24% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 209 Coolock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 209 Coolock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Coolock voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZJWFDD2wks2W
standardised procedures that are carefully crafted could benefit member states. however, while states should be encouraged to consider what they can offer in terms of asylum provision, there should be no pressure or expectation on any state to take in more asylum seekers than that country is willing to and comfortable with.
@9ZJGTL52wks2W
No. Certain EU countries bear far more responsibility for creating the conditions that have led to more asylum seekers.
@9ZGPWHT2wks2W
No country should have to take asylum seekers unless they are vetted properly
@9ZGNCP52wks2W
every country should do its part for immigrants at high risk, not economic immigrants. this system should be means tested by each country
@9NLD6756mos6MO
Yes but countries should be free to make amendments to it
@9ZB9DZJ2wks2W
Yes, but countries should be able to make individual adjustments to best suit the needs of the country.
@9YLWFQB3wks3W
No because that would mean you HAVE to take people in even if your country is in a state and who would provide the necessities for these people? The tax payer??
@9YLMRTH3wks3W
only if it increases the rights of asylum seekers and isn't used as a sick ploy to shuffle them around
Join in on the most popular conversations.
