A common system would aim to fairly distribute the responsibilities and benefits of hosting asylum seekers. Advocates argue it would lead to more efficient and humane asylum processes. Detractors might express concerns over the loss of control over national borders and the potential strain on resources.
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@ISIDEWITH9mos9MO
@9ZGNCP53mos3MO
every country should do its part for immigrants at high risk, not economic immigrants. this system should be means tested by each country
@9ZJGTL5PBB Solidarity3mos3MO
No. Certain EU countries bear far more responsibility for creating the conditions that have led to more asylum seekers.
@9ZGPWHT3mos3MO
No country should have to take asylum seekers unless they are vetted properly
@9ZJWFDDIndependent3mos3MO
standardised procedures that are carefully crafted could benefit member states. however, while states should be encouraged to consider what they can offer in terms of asylum provision, there should be no pressure or expectation on any state to take in more asylum seekers than that country is willing to and comfortable with.
@9ZB9DZJ3mos3MO
Yes, but countries should be able to make individual adjustments to best suit the needs of the country.
@9YLMRTH3mos3MO
only if it increases the rights of asylum seekers and isn't used as a sick ploy to shuffle them around
Yes, as long as it treats all people with dignity and respect.
@9NPQ5W6 8mos8MO
If the system is upheld unequally by all states then yes. If it places unrealistic expectations on certain states than others, then no.
@9NPH4WH 8mos8MO
Yea but countries should be able to make their own amendments
@9NLD6758mos8MO
Yes but countries should be free to make amendments to it
@9YLWFQB3mos3MO
No because that would mean you HAVE to take people in even if your country is in a state and who would provide the necessities for these people? The tax payer??
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.
