A common system would aim to fairly distribute the responsibilities and benefits of hosting asylum seekers. Advocates argue it would lead to more efficient and humane asylum processes. Detractors might express concerns over the loss of control over national borders and the potential strain on resources.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Constituency
County
Region
Barony
Electoral Division
Response rates from 562 Dublin voters.
73% Yes |
27% No |
73% Yes |
27% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 562 Dublin voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 562 Dublin voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Dublin voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZGNCP53mos3MO
every country should do its part for immigrants at high risk, not economic immigrants. this system should be means tested by each country
@9ZJGTL53mos3MO
No. Certain EU countries bear far more responsibility for creating the conditions that have led to more asylum seekers.
@9ZGPWHT3mos3MO
No country should have to take asylum seekers unless they are vetted properly
@9ZJWFDD3mos3MO
standardised procedures that are carefully crafted could benefit member states. however, while states should be encouraged to consider what they can offer in terms of asylum provision, there should be no pressure or expectation on any state to take in more asylum seekers than that country is willing to and comfortable with.
@9ZB9DZJ3mos3MO
Yes, but countries should be able to make individual adjustments to best suit the needs of the country.
@9YLMRTH3mos3MO
only if it increases the rights of asylum seekers and isn't used as a sick ploy to shuffle them around
@9QB9DWM8mos8MO
Yes, as long as it treats all people with dignity and respect.
@9NPQ5W6 9mos9MO
If the system is upheld unequally by all states then yes. If it places unrealistic expectations on certain states than others, then no.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
