Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Response rates from 326 Clondalkin-Cappaghmore voters.
31% Yes |
69% No |
18% Yes |
65% No |
12% Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
3% No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
1% Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment |
1% No, too many people are innocently convicted |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 326 Clondalkin-Cappaghmore voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 326 Clondalkin-Cappaghmore voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Clondalkin-Cappaghmore voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@94RHZLJ2yrs2Y
Yes, for war crimes and other horrific crimes, but life sentence other wise as normal.
@8T3NV2H3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if imprisonment were also banned. Legal punishments should be quick and cheap, such as mutilation/tarring & feathering.
@97Q84D42yrs2Y
Yes, I do support for extreme crime or termism
@92Y8C6L3yrs3Y
No, for serious crimes like murder, convicts should be used in medical trials that are otherwise unsafe for general public.
@8XFLST73yrs3Y
the death penalty should be the last resort
@8CWNV9J3yrs3Y
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence and high treason, e.g Neo-Liberalism, Socialism.
@8XPKLLH3yrs3Y
In the case of child abuse and murder
@9ZMXC9H 3 days3D
Yes, but only in cases where a crime was committed against a child / horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
