Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Response rates from 476 Sutton voters.
31% Yes |
69% No |
17% Yes |
61% No |
14% Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
7% No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
0% Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment |
1% No, too many people are innocently convicted |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 476 Sutton voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 476 Sutton voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Sutton voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@94RHZLJ2yrs2Y
Yes, for war crimes and other horrific crimes, but life sentence other wise as normal.
@8T3NV2H3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if imprisonment were also banned. Legal punishments should be quick and cheap, such as mutilation/tarring & feathering.
@97Q84D42yrs2Y
Yes, I do support for extreme crime or termism
@92Y8C6L3yrs3Y
No, for serious crimes like murder, convicts should be used in medical trials that are otherwise unsafe for general public.
@8XFLST73yrs3Y
the death penalty should be the last resort
@8CWNV9J3yrs3Y
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence and high treason, e.g Neo-Liberalism, Socialism.
@8XPKLLH3yrs3Y
In the case of child abuse and murder
@9ZMXC9H 3 days3D
Yes, but only in cases where a crime was committed against a child / horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.