+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 219 Clonturk voters.

45%
Yes
55%
No
18%
Yes
55%
No
27%
Yes, but not for cosmetics

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 219 Clonturk voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 219 Clonturk voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Clonturk voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZWDBC5answered…4wks4W

Yes, under controlled, limited and humane circumstances, and where alternatives have been exhausted. All use of animals in testing that would be considered in any way cruel should be banned.

 @9ZW7VF2answered…4wks4W

Yes but they should minimise suffering as much as possible and use alternative routers where possible

 @9ZVBC5Ranswered…4wks4W

More in vitro methods should be used when possible instead of in vivo and more funding for new research and development of anti-animal testing in vitro methods

 @9ZR5NLDanswered…1mo1MO

Yes as long as it is properly regulated to avoid the mistreatment of said animals. Realistically it is better to test stuff out on animals before humans as long as it is done in the most humane way possible. There should be heavy penalties/charges for inhumane treatment of the animals

 @9YNGCR9answered…2mos2MO

Absolutely not! Animal abuse how about human testing aswell considering the products are for us to use maybe companies will stop selling bad quality products!

 @9ZHHRQCanswered…1mo1MO

Yes, provided there are government rules regulating how this research can be carried out, along with government oversight to ensure that these rules are being abided by.

 @9ZCTZV6answered…2mos2MO

Yes but not for cosmetic and it should be reuglated that it is only allowed if there are no other options, and it has been tested and passed certain tests beforehand.