Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

Yes, under controlled, limited and humane circumstances, and where alternatives have been exhausted. All use of animals in testing that would be considered in any way cruel should be banned.

Yes but they should minimise suffering as much as possible and use alternative routers where possible

More in vitro methods should be used when possible instead of in vivo and more funding for new research and development of anti-animal testing in vitro methods

Trial on murderers

Yes as long as it is properly regulated to avoid the mistreatment of said animals. Realistically it is better to test stuff out on animals before humans as long as it is done in the most humane way possible. There should be heavy penalties/charges for inhumane treatment of the animals

Absolutely not! Animal abuse how about human testing aswell considering the products are for us to use maybe companies will stop selling bad quality products!

Yes, provided there are government rules regulating how this research can be carried out, along with government oversight to ensure that these rules are being abided by.

Yes but not for cosmetic and it should be reuglated that it is only allowed if there are no other options, and it has been tested and passed certain tests beforehand.

No, as unfortunately the effects of drug testing on animals can be more easily maintained and be of less risk than testing first on humans, but incentivise researchers to utilise other means of drugs testing as well as allowing human participants to sign up, also increase monitoring on researchers testing on animals and ban the use of animal testing for cosmetics.

Test on humans instead - it’s human products nothing to do with any other species so test it on them people who volunteer for a certain price or prison cell inmates who are there for large offences

i do not personally agree with animal use in testing but i think it is vital / important for medical advancement until something else comes along that is more animal friendly

Yes, but only in limited circumstances with strict regulation and ethical guidelines, reducing harm where possible

only if there is so necessary

yes but only if no other option exists

Yes, but they must be treated with care

No, use criminals for testing of products instead. Only animal products such as animal medicine are to be tested on animals.

Only for medicines that could save the lives of a number of humans eg cancer medication, heart medication

No overall but currently it is necessary for medical purposes. We should invest more into computational approaches.

With cosmetics yes, but with vaccines I'm not entirely sure, though that prolly stems from my specieism

Yes, but under strictly humane circumstances

only for medical use but not for cosmetics

Yes, but as long as the animals used for testing are not endangered.

Prisoners that are sentenced to life should be involved in tests

This is already done in phase 2 trials but not for cosmetics.

No, animals should not be used for testing. Instead criminals should be used for testing.

Yes but only for medical reasons and publicly fund research into alternatives to animal testing (e.g. stem cell testing)

No , test on pedophiles and rapists

Only chickens

Only in cruelty free manner

No, by this stage a method should be developed to test these without using living beings.

Only animals that can be spared.

yes but the drug should be thouroghly be researched and examined first

Yes but only if the item they are testing is non toxic and safe

Not if absolutely necessary if have no do in most human way possible

Yes, If done humanely and only on certain animals

We should take into consideration the suffering of the animal

Yes, if ethically approved and proper protective procedures and cautions are taken for the animals

Only for life-saving medicines

Yes, but only for those who are terminally ill

Yes as long as they aren’t in danger for extinction

This would be an infringment of Animal rights

Yes, but testing should not cause suffering to the animals, should be sustainable and should be of long-term benefit to the animals.

Should pay people to test products instead

no, use murderers, rapists, pedophiles.

Yes, but only for medical reasons and only when there is no other alternative

Not for cosmetics And where possible no

Yes, but not for cosmetics and humanly

bro its legit just monkee

only if the animal is injured

unless there is a needed vaccination, no

yes if it wont harm them

to save lifes

How might society change if animal testing for medical research was no longer permitted?

What is your standpoint on the moral implications of sacrificing animal lives for potentially life-saving drugs for humans?

Can you think of a situation where you would consider animal testing justifiable, and what would that situation be?

Imagine if animal testing had never been allowed; in what ways do you think modern medicine might be different?

If you had to choose between a tested and an untested medicine in a critical situation, knowing the tested one involved animal testing, which would you choose and why?

How do you feel about using animals for testing the products you use daily?

Have you ever used a medical treatment and later found out it was tested on animals; what was your reaction?

What are your thoughts on the balance between human health benefits and the welfare of animals in medical research?

If there was an equally effective alternative to animal testing, would you support a complete switch and why?

Have you or someone you know ever benefited from a medical treatment developed through animal testing?

Yes, but not for VANITY cosmetics.

Yes, but only it is deemed safe