Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

No , test on pedophiles and rapists

Only chickens

Only in cruelty free manner

No, by this stage a method should be developed to test these without using living beings.

Only animals that can be spared.

yes but the drug should be thouroghly be researched and examined first

Yes but only if the item they are testing is non toxic and safe

Not if absolutely necessary if have no do in most human way possible

Yes, If done humanely and only on certain animals

We should take into consideration the suffering of the animal

Yes, if ethically approved and proper protective procedures and cautions are taken for the animals

Only for life-saving medicines

Yes, but only for those who are terminally ill

Yes, but not for cosmetics and humanly

Yes as long as they aren’t in danger for extinction

Yes, but only for medical reasons and only when there is no other alternative

Not for cosmetics And where possible no

Yes, but under strictly humane circumstances

only for medical use but not for cosmetics

Trial on murderers

Yes, but as long as the animals used for testing are not endangered.

This would be an infringment of Animal rights

Prisoners that are sentenced to life should be involved in tests

This is already done in phase 2 trials but not for cosmetics.

No, animals should not be used for testing. Instead criminals should be used for testing.

Yes but only for medical reasons and publicly fund research into alternatives to animal testing (e.g. stem cell testing)

only if there is so necessary

yes but only if no other option exists

Yes, but they must be treated with care

No, use criminals for testing of products instead. Only animal products such as animal medicine are to be tested on animals.

Yes, but testing should not cause suffering to the animals, should be sustainable and should be of long-term benefit to the animals.

Should pay people to test products instead

no, use murderers, rapists, pedophiles.

If you had to choose between a tested and an untested medicine in a critical situation, knowing the tested one involved animal testing, which would you choose and why?

Imagine if animal testing had never been allowed; in what ways do you think modern medicine might be different?

Can you think of a situation where you would consider animal testing justifiable, and what would that situation be?

What is your standpoint on the moral implications of sacrificing animal lives for potentially life-saving drugs for humans?

How might society change if animal testing for medical research was no longer permitted?

Have you or someone you know ever benefited from a medical treatment developed through animal testing?

If there was an equally effective alternative to animal testing, would you support a complete switch and why?

What are your thoughts on the balance between human health benefits and the welfare of animals in medical research?

Have you ever used a medical treatment and later found out it was tested on animals; what was your reaction?

How do you feel about using animals for testing the products you use daily?

yes if it wont harm them

to save lifes

unless there is a needed vaccination, no

only if the animal is injured

Yes, but not for VANITY cosmetics.

bro its legit just monkee