Statistics are shown for this demographic
Constituency
Barony
Response rates from 410 Portobello voters.
50% Yes |
50% No |
29% Yes |
50% No |
22% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 410 Portobello voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 410 Portobello voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Portobello voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZWDBC53mos3MO
Yes, under controlled, limited and humane circumstances, and where alternatives have been exhausted. All use of animals in testing that would be considered in any way cruel should be banned.
@9ZW7VF23mos3MO
Yes but they should minimise suffering as much as possible and use alternative routers where possible
@9ZVBC5R3mos3MO
More in vitro methods should be used when possible instead of in vivo and more funding for new research and development of anti-animal testing in vitro methods
@9ZR5NLD3mos3MO
Yes as long as it is properly regulated to avoid the mistreatment of said animals. Realistically it is better to test stuff out on animals before humans as long as it is done in the most humane way possible. There should be heavy penalties/charges for inhumane treatment of the animals
@9YNGCR93mos3MO
Absolutely not! Animal abuse how about human testing aswell considering the products are for us to use maybe companies will stop selling bad quality products!
@9ZHHRQC3mos3MO
Yes, provided there are government rules regulating how this research can be carried out, along with government oversight to ensure that these rules are being abided by.
@9ZCTZV63mos3MO
Yes but not for cosmetic and it should be reuglated that it is only allowed if there are no other options, and it has been tested and passed certain tests beforehand.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
