In January 2018 Germany passed the NetzDG law which required platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to take down perceived illegal content within 24 hours or seven days, depending on the charge, or risk a fine of €50 million ($60 million) fines. In July 2018 representatives from Facebook, Google and Twitter denied to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary committee that they censor content for political reasons. During the hearing Republican members of Congress criticized the social media companies for politically motivated practices in removing some content, a charge the…
Read moreStatistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Response rates from 460 Louth voters.
54% Yes |
46% No |
48% Yes |
32% No |
5% Yes, there is too much fake news and misinformation on social media |
10% No, the government should not determine what is fake or real news |
1% Yes, social media companies are politically biased and need to be regulated |
5% No, social media companies are private and should not be regulated by the government |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 460 Louth voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 460 Louth voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Louth voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MBLRCN7mos7MO
No, but they should make mandatory for the public, specially in schools, good practice of navigating the internet and analysing information critically.
@9HV3M6711mos11MO
the government should fund bodies that do this work, with a team of experts, rather than trying to do it themselves
@9MQ3FV86mos6MO
It should be regulated but not by the government. Preferably a third party designed to ensure regulation without bias.
@9ZL9LC92wks2W
I believe fake news and misinformation is rampant. I don't believe it should be removed but warnings should be put on videos containing this information
@9ZL6BT72wks2W
Yes there is too much fake news and misinformation however there is still importance in having diversity of opinion available rather than the government becoming the authority deciding what information is available. Basically, everyone can have their opinion but their opinion can't be based in complete nonsense. Like if fianna fail is head of government then I shouldn't not be able to see rational and valid criticisms of their practices because they seem it misinformation but it's all fierce nuanced
@9ZJQF552wks2W
There should be a regulation service by government but they should not have the ultimate decision on this.
@9ZKRGFY2wks2W
Yes, but only on completely objective points of information. Under no circumstances should opinion be regulated
@9ZKDSQ52wks2W
No but there should be community guidelines and fact checked answers beside false information/statistics/statements
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Social Media Regulation” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
