In January 2018 Germany passed the NetzDG law which required platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to take down perceived illegal content within 24 hours or seven days, depending on the charge, or risk a fine of €50 million ($60 million) fines. In July 2018 representatives from Facebook, Google and Twitter denied to the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary committee that they censor content for political reasons. During the hearing Republican members of Congress criticized the social media companies for politically motivated practices in removing some content, a charge the…
Read moreNarrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Ideology:
Province:
County:
Region:
Electoral Division:
Constituency:
Townland:
@9MBLRCN8mos8MO
No, but they should make mandatory for the public, specially in schools, good practice of navigating the internet and analysing information critically.
@9HV3M67Fianna Fáil12mos12MO
the government should fund bodies that do this work, with a team of experts, rather than trying to do it themselves
@9MQ3FV88mos8MO
It should be regulated but not by the government. Preferably a third party designed to ensure regulation without bias.
@9ZX97JM1mo1MO
I think they shouldn’t regulate it too heavily but keen an eye on it. This may become a bigger problem in the future but right now, I think it’s okay.
@9ZWFCXL1mo1MO
Social media companies should be held responsible for the objectively false info on their sites, especially when they promote the spread
@9ZW8D8Y1mo1MO
Yes, to a degree. Twitter has a "Community Notes" feature that allows people to fact check potential misinformation, and I think a government body that provides additional context to some degree available on social networks would be helpful as well, encouraging others to contribute as that would be a massive workload.
@9ZW8CM61mo1MO
Just have a question of how they would do this ? I agree that some information is very questionable and shouldn’t be allowed to be available especially to young people
@9ZW7DHS1mo1MO
yes however there should be an independent non government agency reviewing the governments actions to make sure that the government aren't censoring our news either
@9ZW53TZ1mo1MO
no as i believe people should be allowed decide for themselves, government can use this to their adavantage and follow in footsteps of other countries
@9ZW2WS51mo1MO
No, the government has no right to censor what the public sees online, but there should be available information and possible classes on how to distinguish "fake news" from reality
@9ZVTZWR1mo1MO
They need to have certain guidelines on what can be posted and then the media companies should follow them
@9ZVSS8V1mo1MO
No the government should not decide what is right and wrong when it comes to opinions but scientific misinformation should be policed
@9ZVHMPY1mo1MO
I don’t think you should because you’re taking away free speach but it’s important to bring in information on fake news
@9ZV4WGH1mo1MO
No, but literacy programmes need to be expanded in order to make sure citizens are alert and careful with any news, regardless of the source.
@9ZV2KYFSocial Democrats1mo1MO
I believe in the government's responsibility to uphold free speech for all. However, it also the government responsibility to protect and promote the integrity of journalism and media coverage.
@9ZTZ4P51mo1MO
No the government should have no opinion on what is put on the media unless they put it up themselves and let people have their opinions and facts to bring to the table and not be limited
@9ZTXHFL1mo1MO
No but social media companies should be required to apply a disclaimer that the information may not be correct or may be misleading
@9ZTW5S21mo1MO
I don't think the government should have the ability to interfere with a private company but the companies should be regulating it themselves
@9ZTTY2C1mo1MO
I think government should have pop-ups which state '```false information' or have an option to fact check
@9ZTKL431mo1MO
Yes and no, but even in government there is misinformation so how is one to judge. It is everywhere and increasing due to availability of information and different thinking. One cannot be scoped into one way of thinking.
@9ZTH8NS1mo1MO
Governments should fund media literacy - entering into government-controlled media is a slippery slope
@9ZTFGW31mo1MO
No but funding should be provided to increase awareness around social media and the Internet and how to ensure sources are credible
No but there should be community guidelines and fact checked answers beside false information/statistics/statements
@9ZK54KJ 2mos2MO
No, the government should not be involved, unless there is genuine harm/threat to public security, health, or fundamental rights
@9ZK2BNM2mos2MO
Socail media in general should be regulated especially to children but I don’t think that should be the government responsibility
@9ZJS7932mos2MO
yes i agree that there's a lot of fake news and misinformation spread online but i fear that government censorship could affect free speech
@9ZJ247Z2mos2MO
No, but they should do more to provide reliable alternatives from evidence-based, non-partisan research, with references. Or, an assessment of which news sources are reporting what and which political direction those news sources lean. People need more context for the information they consume.
I don’t want a spread of misinformation but the government being in such great power appears as suffocating
The government should work to combat misinformation, without having to directly police social media networks
No, there is too much fake news but i don't think the government should control what is real or fake news
@9ZHV2WT2mos2MO
Government dictating what is and isnt fake news outside of common sense is a slippery slope however disinfomation is becoming more and more convincing, it should be closely monitored and actively disproven to
No. Filtering 'fake news' opens the way for a corrupt politician to manipulate the news to fit their narrative.
No, but a similar system to community notes on Twitter should be implemented, information on who and where info was posted should be made clear.
i think they should be regulated , but not by the government as they can influence what is true and what is false
Yes, but there should be independent oversight to prevent the government from over exerting its control over social media sites.
@9ZH5G8ZSocial Democrats2mos2MO
No, but the government should provide the state with better media literacy education to better identify what is and isn’t fake news
No, not in totality, but the government should have the power to prosecute creators of AI-generated deepfake content
@9ZH3W6FSocial Democrats2mos2MO
No, but media literacy should be a mandatory subject in the education system to allow people to decode the information better
@9ZGYRVY2mos2MO
There should be more laws in place for social media regulation but I don't believe the government should have sole control over it
In between, government shouldn’t determine what’s real or fake unless it has huge importance to an issue or how the public take the news but there should be some relegation on certain kinds of information being spread
@9ZGQ46J2mos2MO
No, regulation should come from an independent third party organisation, otherwise anything could be censored
@9ZGM8RX2mos2MO
I think all media and nee should be regulated for what the post, I don’t think the government should do it though
@9ZGM37W2mos2MO
Social media should have stricter regulations and should be peer reviewed before being posted, but no government should be able to dictate what is fake and what is not completely.
@9ZGLSWC2mos2MO
Social media needs to be controlled in a way I don’t think the government should be responsible for it because that could pose issues with control but there definitely needs to be regulation
@9ZFTBT82mos2MO
The government already have RTE to spread FF/FG propaganda, we don’t need them taking over everything
@9ZFS6RZ2mos2MO
Social media sites should be regulated to stop fake news and misinformation, but perhaps by an external body rather than directly by the government.
@9ZFPSQY2mos2MO
They should enter the conversation - but not control it. With the exception of fake news which contravenes the law - is racist, incites violence etc
@9ZFMR9Y2mos2MO
social media companies are their own private agencies but the government should engage more online as a reliable source of news to avoid disinformation
I believe something should be done but dont k ow if it should be up to the government to decied as they ca spin the news as they want
@9ZFDJWP2mos2MO
Yes, but external regulation is also needed, I do not trust the government not to also spread misinformation
@9ZFCYMV2mos2MO
Regulation of social media companies should be centred around their energy and data usage, not around the content of their applications.
@9ZF7M5H2mos2MO
The government is one of the main distributors of misinformation and fake news. Rte constantly cherry picks and promotes false narratives. They should be held accountable along with all other msm networks
@9ZDYXT72mos2MO
Social media companies should responsible for moderating their news, and be held accountable for misinformation and it’s consequences.
@9ZDY2BR2mos2MO
No, social media should not be regulated by the government, but the government could use social media to inform its residents and citizens if what is fake and what is real
@9ZDWJFPPBB Solidarity2mos2MO
Social media companies should be subject to managing misinformation and disinformation but from a separate body than the government. Social media and AI regulated under similar regulations
@9ZDWDNP2mos2MO
No, but support funding for public service announcements etc where fake news could be debunked with investigative journalism and evidence of research
@9ZDW5P92mos2MO
Only if it’s reported as fake news and the government could still twist the narrative of social media
@9ZDKZDF2mos2MO
They should remove any fake news that have no credible evidence but if they regulate everything then free speech should be removed
@9ZD5QR52mos2MO
The government should put the pressure onto the social media company’s to enforce stricter regulations
@9ZCTZV62mos2MO
Yes, but it should be highly regulated, only news that is guaranteed as fake and is harmful to society should be banned, and not just news and information that goes against the the current consensus and beliefs so as to allow for space for change.
@9ZCKKP72mos2MO
No the government shouldn’t regulate it however there should be independent audits to ensure no fake news
@9ZBR9BY2mos2MO
I believe social media companies need to regulate fake news certainly not government parties as they stand to gain too much power depending on their agenda
@9Z997FSSocial Democrats2mos2MO
Yes, but only in regards to fake information that endangers public health and safety (eg. conspiracies about COVID-19).
@9ZSLZF61mo1MO
There should be better management and reduction of misinformation online as it is can cause many problems and risks for people, but the government should not be the ones to manage it
@9ZSLNKZ1mo1MO
The government should put measures in place to ensure social media companies are responsible for regulating misinformation and place sanctions on those who don't.
@9ZSLF6N1mo1MO
No but I believe the private social media company’s themselves (example TikTok) should put more regulations and rule and montier there platform to stop the spread of fake or hateful news
While the distribution of fake news and misinformation is becoming a growing problem on social media, allowing the government to “regulate” this could very quickly lead to complete censorship of certain topics that the government doesn’t agree with. If this were possible, the Irish public may not have access to the information coming from disasters such as the Palestinian, Sundanese and Congolese genocides or the failure of the government to fulfil manifesto promises. However there does need to be some sort of regulation to limit fake news and misinformation.
Better education to help more at risk individuals understand the difference and the risk of misinformation
@9ZNWHNTSocial Democrats1mo1MO
no, government should not have control over information released by social media sites, this is a form of censorship. However, the government should provide information on how to interpret information.
Yes, however, a team of representatives should be put together that work for but are not influenced by the government
@9ZMVBSF2mos2MO
Social media should be regulated and verified for fake news & disinformation but it should be a seperate& independant body that does this, not the government
No, this can become a slippery slope to censorship. However, increased pressure should be put on social media companies to combat fake news and misinformation including the addition of a mandatory disclaimer if something is discovered to be fake news or proved untrue.
It needs regulating and education needed on how to read social media in order to make informed decisions, do one’s own research. Getting harder to do so
@9ZM37GQSocial Democrats2mos2MO
No they should be able to fine social media companies if they are proven to share fake news or misinformation.
@9ZLSMTT2mos2MO
It's a very slippery slope when giving the government the power of changing information, and thus you have to be cautious
No, instead we should invest in creating fact checking, trustworthy sites and educate people regarding misinformation and disinformation, propaganda and mind manipulation of masses through social media and internet.
I believe fake news and misinformation is rampant. I don't believe it should be removed but warnings should be put on videos containing this information
@9ZL6BT72mos2MO
Yes there is too much fake news and misinformation however there is still importance in having diversity of opinion available rather than the government becoming the authority deciding what information is available. Basically, everyone can have their opinion but their opinion can't be based in complete nonsense. Like if fianna fail is head of government then I shouldn't not be able to see rational and valid criticisms of their practices because they seem it misinformation but it's all fierce nuanced
@9ZJQF55People Before Profit2mos2MO
There should be a regulation service by government but they should not have the ultimate decision on this.
Yes, but only on completely objective points of information. Under no circumstances should opinion be regulated
@ISIDEWITH4mos4MO
How should social media handle offensive but not illegal content, considering diverse global views?
@9V65Q8T3mos3MO
Social media platforms can't take down something if its not illegal, so i believe they should give the author/user warnings and if they're not heeded they should be either blocked or taken down.
@9SWMJY6Independent4mos4MO
Social Media companies act as a Speakers Corner, let any tosspot with two cents to throw allow them to do so. People with a larger following need to be under more scrutiny and social media companies are wising up to that like Twitter with "Community Notes" which are fact checked by independent agencies ensuring accurate information
@9QYL3WR6mos6MO
Allow a neutral body to do so rather than a politically motivated government or profit motivated corporation
@9NPNKQK7mos7MO
I do believe there needs to be regulations to reduce the spead of misinformation, however I do not believe the government should decide what is or is not misinformation
@9NL327N7mos7MO
The government should be on its own regulate social media companies but also it cannot be left up to the companies themselves. Therefore, it should be a coordinated approach across the EU or broader or another independent assessor.
@9D9TW7N1yr1Y
No, but probably need legislation to regulate social media and protect user's right
@9ZSYJ9X1mo1MO
Government entities should regulate some with an independent commision evaulating choices made, meeting minutes and association of each member who is able to regulate and monitor. We should be building the best template for regulating fake news ehile allowing independent media to have a place.
@9ZG2CJ52mos2MO
I believe government censorship or intervention with media is a dangerous game and infringes on people’s right to privacy and right to freedom of speech, what needs to be done is a reformation of education system include classes on media literacy and fact checking, critical thinking is very important.
A person publishing slander in social media is to be responsible, not the media itself. In case of just expressing an opinion, all opinions should be allowed.
i think that the government stating whether or not something is fake news could be exploited by politicians to ensure nobody says anything bad about them.
@9ZG2LR32mos2MO
fake news and misinformation is always going to be present, no matter if the government attempts to regulate it or not, possible hate speech laws could combat this but also it’s a huge grey area, regulation isn’t really a fix to fake news though
@8V25DP73yrs3Y
Have very little belief this could be defined properly by anyone in Irish politics
@8TSF6NR3yrs3Y
No, but international authorities should be the ones to regulate social media
@8T3NV2HRenua Ireland4yrs4Y
No, the government are the main suppliers of fake news.
@8RLNYM84yrs4Y
No, because it would be a risk if the government does not have the public interest at heart. So yes if there exists a solution that avoids the risk of censorship on the wrong people. More political education and anti capitalism anyway.
@8RFPQ464yrs4Y
No, but they should ensure that social media companies are adhering to their regulations surrounding the spreading of fake news
@8PT57XP4yrs4Y
No, I do think there needs to be more regulation around fake news on social media, but don't trust our government to do it properly.
@8NSR6PC4yrs4Y
@8CWNV9J4yrs4Y
No, fact checkers should be allowed to scrutinise narratives with their political leaning publicly displayed
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.