+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 542 Rathdown voters.

65%
Yes
35%
No
57%
Yes
25%
No
4%
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
6%
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
4%
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
4%
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
0%
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 542 Rathdown voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 542 Rathdown voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Rathdown voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZJGYFXanswered…1wk1W

Term limits but have a criteria to reach to be eligible to have another term, and decrease pay and retirement benefits regardless

 @9YNB66Manswered…2wks2W

No but we need a set retirement age so we don’t have people over 65 running the country. Make it so you must be 61 at your time of re-election and older than that then you can’t run or something like that

 @9YM7NHXanswered…2wks2W

No. There should be a vote every 4 years, asking citizens if they believe the current government is doing a good job or not. If not, a new election will be held. But the people in power should remain in power if the people corroborate that they are doing a good job.

 @9NQ6886answered…6mos6MO

If the limits were less then they could think in longer terms for the future instead of smaller stints like only four years

 @conorbruce answered…6mos6MO

No, as i feel elections are good term limits but I do believe wages and benefits should be lowered for TD's

 @9NNM2CHanswered…6mos6MO

No, but limit retirement benefits to only kick in when they reach retirement age, and remove benefits once they leave

 @9HM7ZJWanswered…11mos11MO

There should not be term limits. They should be tested in the cognitive abilities, Mental health, physicality and their past performance.

 @8ZJCKMHanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but there should be a no moonlighting clause. If you are elected you should hold no business, shares, directorships, or rental property and you must retire to a public servant pension.