+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 497 Meath voters.

69%
Yes
31%
No
59%
Yes
24%
No
5%
Yes, and decrease their salary and retirement benefits
4%
No, officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time
5%
Yes, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption
4%
No, we already have term limits that are called “elections”
0%
Yes, term limits for the House but not the Senate

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 497 Meath voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 497 Meath voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Meath voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZQ3L99answered…2mos2MO

Yes term limits on performance and cut of pensions if found of misused power for gains of acquaintances

 @9ZJGYFXanswered…3mos3MO

Term limits but have a criteria to reach to be eligible to have another term, and decrease pay and retirement benefits regardless

 @9YNB66Manswered…3mos3MO

No but we need a set retirement age so we don’t have people over 65 running the country. Make it so you must be 61 at your time of re-election and older than that then you can’t run or something like that

 @9YM7NHXanswered…3mos3MO

No. There should be a vote every 4 years, asking citizens if they believe the current government is doing a good job or not. If not, a new election will be held. But the people in power should remain in power if the people corroborate that they are doing a good job.

 @conorbruce answered…8mos8MO

No, as i feel elections are good term limits but I do believe wages and benefits should be lowered for TD's

 @9HM7ZJWanswered…1yr1Y

There should not be term limits. They should be tested in the cognitive abilities, Mental health, physicality and their past performance.

 @8ZJCKMHanswered…3yrs3Y

No, but there should be a no moonlighting clause. If you are elected you should hold no business, shares, directorships, or rental property and you must retire to a public servant pension.

 @9NQ6886answered…8mos8MO

If the limits were less then they could think in longer terms for the future instead of smaller stints like only four years