+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 124 Clonliff South voters.

91%
Yes
9%
No
91%
Yes
9%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 124 Clonliff South voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 124 Clonliff South voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Clonliff South voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZHM8C5answered…3wks3W

Yes and no, they should support these things somewhat but also these supluses need to be used on long term country improvements.

 @9ZLMJ2Qanswered…2wks2W

Should have a choice to accept the tax cut or instead select where you want the equivalent funds to go

 @9ZL7RNZanswered…2wks2W

Supports for cost of living should only be be given to people who work, who have disability’s and require care, those who are careers and those who are single parents.

 @9ZKQBNQanswered…2wks2W

Should be used to provide more multi unit houses that only first time buyers can purchase, should be used for medium transport infrastructure

 @9ZK2FHVanswered…2wks2W

These are 2 different things and should not be lumped together. Public services should be funded by budget surplus.

 @9ZJWFDDanswered…2wks2W

to a degree. it should also fund defense, national autonomy, housing, sovereignty, large emergency funds and self-sufficiency.

 @9ZJGTL5answered…2wks2W

It should fund infrastructural development as well. Otherwise it's a plaster being put on a gaping wound.

 @9ZJ6XYRanswered…3wks3W

I think the surplus should be divided between investment in public services and bracing for economic downturn