+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 277 Intake voters.

95%
Yes
5%
No
95%
Yes
5%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 277 Intake voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 277 Intake voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Intake voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZHM8C5answered…3mos3MO

Yes and no, they should support these things somewhat but also these supluses need to be used on long term country improvements.

 @9ZL7RNZanswered…3mos3MO

Supports for cost of living should only be be given to people who work, who have disability’s and require care, those who are careers and those who are single parents.

 @9ZK2FHVanswered…3mos3MO

These are 2 different things and should not be lumped together. Public services should be funded by budget surplus.

 @9ZJWFDDanswered…3mos3MO

to a degree. it should also fund defense, national autonomy, housing, sovereignty, large emergency funds and self-sufficiency.

 @9ZJ6F3Janswered…3mos3MO

I think tax should be better spent but cost of living supports and public services should be better invested in.

 @9ZLMJ2Qanswered…3mos3MO

Should have a choice to accept the tax cut or instead select where you want the equivalent funds to go

 @9ZKQBNQanswered…3mos3MO

Should be used to provide more multi unit houses that only first time buyers can purchase, should be used for medium transport infrastructure

 @9ZJGTL5answered…3mos3MO

It should fund infrastructural development as well. Otherwise it's a plaster being put on a gaping wound.