Lab-grown meat is produced by culturing animal cells and could serve as an alternative to traditional livestock farming. Proponents argue that it can reduce environmental impact and animal suffering, and improve food security. Opponents argue that it may face public resistance and unknown long-term health effects.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 3.1k Right voters.
15% Yes |
85% No |
12% Yes |
80% No |
3% Yes, as long as a disclosure is prominently displayed on packaging and restaurant menus |
5% No, we need more long-term studies to ensure safety |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.1k Right voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 3.1k Right voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZRBX2X2wks2W
If lab-grown meat is to be commercialised, chattle farmers need to be subsidised in order to convert to arable farming.
@9ZW5DMK4 days4D
Investment into natural unprocessed food to make it more accessible to lower income families is far more important.
@9MLXW347mos7MO
Yes, as long as the sector is regulated as with the food and agriculture industries.
@9ZF5GD53wks3W
If there are no health concerns with the specific meat products added to the market, I see no issue with it.
@9YLLZZK4wks4W
We're not there yet, but thought also has to be given to what this will do to already existing industries.
@9S5TD224mos4MO
No, and should be encouraging the creation and refinement of plant-based alternatives
@9NWX4CX6mos6MO
Only in the case where there is a massive food shortage to an extent everyone is a ak risk from dying from starvation in the near future.
@9NPR5D86mos6MO
Only if the lab-grown meat is required to meet the same safety and regular inspection requirements as medication
Join in on the most popular conversations.
