+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 163 Dublin Central voters.

66%
Yes
34%
No
66%
Yes
34%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 163 Dublin Central voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 163 Dublin Central voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Dublin Central voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZTZRT4answered…2mos2MO

yes, but allow citizens with diseases to make their own decisions to take informed-potential risks to utilised this tech to help them

 @9ZT35WManswered…2mos2MO

EMA would already regulate this. CRISPR should only be applied in the disease curing / prevention context, and not for other uses.

 @9ZL6BT7answered…2mos2MO

This question is misleading. They aren't genetically modifying people forcefully or without consent. You need to be clear that this is in disease prevention and treatment (not as a separate question)

 @9YJZG96from Illinois  answered…3mos3MO

It should be used for medical reasons, ie to prevent life threatening genetic inheritances.

 @9YN8NDSfrom Pennsylvania  answered…3mos3MO

 @9YN6LXKanswered…3mos3MO

Human genetic modifications are far out of the realm of CRISPR technology as present in the sense that you could design humans, however it has shown some success for disease linked genes. This question is dumb.

 @9SWMJY6answered…5mos5MO

Only to remove 'imperfections' in genetics such as inheritable diseases. It shouldn't be used to 'perfect' humanity, only to remove 'imperfections'. Anything outside of it and it would easily be abused by militaries or other private entities to make "Übermensch"

 @9NPN4VSanswered…8mos8MO

The technology isn’t advanced enough currently for the ethical aspects to be questioned. The government should wait until these ethical issues are addressed and the results are more clear.