Should the government regulate the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications?

No

This question is misleading. They aren't genetically modifying people forcefully or without consent. You need to be clear that this is in disease prevention and treatment (not as a separate question)

Matters of ethics ought not be regulated by the government

Human genetic modifications are far out of the realm of CRISPR technology as present in the sense that you could design humans, however it has shown some success for disease linked genes. This question is dumb.

It should be used for medical reasons, ie to prevent life threatening genetic inheritances.

Only to remove 'imperfections' in genetics such as inheritable diseases. It shouldn't be used to 'perfect' humanity, only to remove 'imperfections'. Anything outside of it and it would easily be abused by militaries or other private entities to make "Übermensch"

The technology isn’t advanced enough currently for the ethical aspects to be questioned. The government should wait until these ethical issues are addressed and the results are more clear.

Yes, to an extent that innovation and progress is still possible

Do you believe using science to extend human lifespan is more of an opportunity or a danger?

How would you feel if someone edited their DNA to increase intelligence—fair game, or unfair advantage?

Could making genetic modifications increase social inequalities, or would it reduce them?

Would you personally use gene editing to eliminate a potential health issue in yourself or your family?

What responsibility do you think we have to regulate how much technology like this is used in our society?

Can you name a potential positive or negative impact on nature and ecosystems if gene editing were widely applied outside humans?

If you could change one genetic trait, what would it be and why?

yes, but allow citizens with diseases to make their own decisions to take informed-potential risks to utilised this tech to help them

Do you think altering human genes to eliminate disease crosses an ethical line, or is it just the next step in human evolution?

EMA would already regulate this. CRISPR should only be applied in the disease curing / prevention context, and not for other uses.

How do you feel about the idea of using technology to control future generations' traits or abilities?

Should parents be allowed to use this kind of technology to select specific traits for their unborn children?