+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 642 Social Democrats voters.

79%
Yes
21%
No
79%
Yes
21%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 642 Social Democrats voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 642 Social Democrats voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Social Democrats voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZTZRT4answered…3wks3W

yes, but allow citizens with diseases to make their own decisions to take informed-potential risks to utilised this tech to help them

 @9ZT35WManswered…3wks3W

EMA would already regulate this. CRISPR should only be applied in the disease curing / prevention context, and not for other uses.

 @9ZL6BT7answered…1mo1MO

This question is misleading. They aren't genetically modifying people forcefully or without consent. You need to be clear that this is in disease prevention and treatment (not as a separate question)

 @9YJZG96from Illinois  answered…1mo1MO

It should be used for medical reasons, ie to prevent life threatening genetic inheritances.

 @9YN8NDSfrom Pennsylvania  answered…1mo1MO

 @9YN6LXKanswered…1mo1MO

Human genetic modifications are far out of the realm of CRISPR technology as present in the sense that you could design humans, however it has shown some success for disease linked genes. This question is dumb.

 @9SWMJY6answered…4mos4MO

Only to remove 'imperfections' in genetics such as inheritable diseases. It shouldn't be used to 'perfect' humanity, only to remove 'imperfections'. Anything outside of it and it would easily be abused by militaries or other private entities to make "Übermensch"

 @9NPN4VSanswered…6mos6MO

The technology isn’t advanced enough currently for the ethical aspects to be questioned. The government should wait until these ethical issues are addressed and the results are more clear.