Facial recognition technology uses software to identify individuals based on their facial features, and can be used to monitor public spaces and enhance security measures. Proponents argue that it enhances public safety by identifying and preventing potential threats, and helps in locating missing persons and criminals. Opponents argue that it infringes on privacy rights, can lead to misuse and discrimination, and raises significant ethical and civil liberties concerns.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 274 Teresa Costello voters.
52% Yes |
48% No |
43% Yes |
46% No |
5% Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency |
1% No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it |
3% Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities |
1% No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens |
0% No, this would be too expensive to implement |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 274 Teresa Costello voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 274 Teresa Costello voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Teresa Costello voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZCXJS72mos2MO
There have been too many documented false positives and misidentifications with these systems in other countries already.
@9RGDDQG6mos6MO
Yes when looking for missing persons and persons of a high security risk snd potential major crimes. It should not be used for a means to tag people or incriminate them nefariously.
@9Z9FXJP2mos2MO
Convicted criminals for violent, felony, drug and sexual crimes should be tracked using facial recognition, but general population
@9YN38LH2mos2MO
Only around areas like schools, airports, etc where there would be a possible risk posed from pedophiles, etc
@9YMZDFR2mos2MO
Only under certain circumstances egg terrorism, missing persons, tracking criminals not for day to day
@9YMSFS52mos2MO
this is situational depending, it should be disclosed what its purpose and exactly where this data goes, it also should be disclosed where this technology is located
@9ZSPGP81mo1MO
This could be good for looking for a criminal/ missing person but would be very expensive and would need to be used with complete transparency
@9ZM42BY2mos2MO
No, AI for surveillance is not developed enough to rely on. It can be bias towards certain sub groups
Join in on the most popular conversations.
