+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 350 Lisnawully voters.

39%
Yes
61%
No
33%
Yes
56%
No
5%
Yes, but only if it’s tightly regulated and used with transparency
3%
No, it sets a dangerous precedent for government control over citizens
1%
Yes, but only targeting criminal hotspots to protect vulnerable communities
1%
No, I trust the technology but not the humans that could misuse it
1%
No, this would be too expensive to implement

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 350 Lisnawully voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 350 Lisnawully voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Lisnawully voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZCXJS7answered…4mos4MO

There have been too many documented false positives and misidentifications with these systems in other countries already.

 @9RGDDQGanswered…8mos8MO

Yes when looking for missing persons and persons of a high security risk snd potential major crimes. It should not be used for a means to tag people or incriminate them nefariously.

 @9Z9FXJPanswered…4mos4MO

Convicted criminals for violent, felony, drug and sexual crimes should be tracked using facial recognition, but general population

 @9YN38LHanswered…4mos4MO

Only around areas like schools, airports, etc where there would be a possible risk posed from pedophiles, etc

 @9YMZDFRanswered…4mos4MO

Only under certain circumstances egg terrorism, missing persons, tracking criminals not for day to day

 @9YMSFS5answered…4mos4MO

this is situational depending, it should be disclosed what its purpose and exactly where this data goes, it also should be disclosed where this technology is located

 @9ZSPGP8answered…4mos4MO

This could be good for looking for a criminal/ missing person but would be very expensive and would need to be used with complete transparency

 @9ZM42BYanswered…4mos4MO

No, AI for surveillance is not developed enough to rely on. It can be bias towards certain sub groups