Increased funding would enhance the capacity and quality of shelters and services that provide support for homeless individuals. Proponents argue that it provides essential support for the homeless and helps reduce homelessness. Opponents argue that it is costly and may not address the root causes of homelessness.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Response rates from 2.2k Nordic Model voters.
98% Yes |
2% No |
98% Yes |
2% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.2k Nordic Model voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 2.2k Nordic Model voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Nordic Model voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9YHX28T2wks2W
no, but focus these funds on the root causes of homelessness and work to abolish these
@9ZL62W56 days6D
Homeless charities should be merged, there are too many and money wasted on admin and inefficiencies
@9ZKSZGF6 days6D
Everyone should have their own front door and a safe place to live where they don't have to interact with other people if they don't want to. No one should be forced to choose between a hostel and the street.
@9ZKQ2JJ7 days7D
They should increase social and regular housing to tackle homelessness rather than find temporary solutions
@9ZK88YP7 days7D
They should reanalyse how they’re locating their funds, emphasising creating shelters for women and children separate from couples and single men
@9ZK3TL87 days7D
Yes but the priority should be on making housing affordable and tackling the root causes of homelessness
@9ZJWFDD1wk1W
they should prioritise making homes available to >everyone< instead of giving out crumbs in the form of shelters etc.
@9ZJPPZ51wk1W
Only if fund management is analyzed and managed properly, lots of funding goes to it but very little to show
Join in on the most popular conversations.
