This policy would limit the amount a CEO can earn compared to the average salary of their employees. Proponents argue that it would reduce income inequality and ensure fairer compensation practices. Opponents argue that it would interfere with business autonomy and could discourage top executive talent.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Province
Constituency
County
Region
Barony
Response rates from 184 Coolock voters.
77% Yes |
23% No |
77% Yes |
23% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 184 Coolock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 184 Coolock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Coolock voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZT6RQX2wks2W
No, unless this question relates to publicly funded entities. I don't think the government should be getting involved in private entities financial decision making
@9NWX4CX6mos6MO
Not to an extent. Depending on the expertise of the CEO they've earned enough to not stay tied to a relative number of lower levels employees but there should be a wage cap
@9MKZG657mos7MO
It should be on comparison of other CEO salaries in the same industry
@9SHFD2G4mos4MO
If the CEO has proven time working at the company and in the country, there should be little need unless the salary is a ridiculous figure
@9P84CCN6mos6MO
No but there should be stricter legislation on stock options, share buybacks, reward linked to a company share price
Join in on the most popular conversations.
