+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 3.8k Labour Party voters.

44%
Yes
56%
No
44%
Yes
56%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 3.8k Labour Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 3.8k Labour Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Labour Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9NJRYJ7answered…6mos6MO

There should be no quota. A country should not be expected to take in migrants at all, especially if their country is already suffering from a housing and economic crisis.

 @9NLW7CXanswered…6mos6MO

No, people should be able to direct a portion of their taxes toward immigrants who cannot sustain themselves. Quotas need to be based on these numbers.

 @9ZLGRDHanswered…1wk1W

No migrants in Ireland unless they decide to move here buy a house and contribute to society like the rest of us

 @9ZK9S5Xanswered…1wk1W

There should be the appropriate infrastructure in place and how many accepted should align with this

 @9ZJTYHPanswered…1wk1W

Not when the country is already experiencing a housing crisis and cannot house our own citizens not to mind immigrants. It is unfair for everyone

 @9ZJDJBGanswered…2wks2W

The EU should have no say in each countries immigration policies, especially if those policies are damaging each country

 @9ZGSPPYanswered…2wks2W

Yes, we barley have enough housing, money, land to build or own things without 10,000 more people coming from abroad. Our children and family's deserve good things too.

 @9ZGQ3FGanswered…2wks2W

Yes but it has to be realistic. The EU is almost fully saturated with migrants and the EU needs to accept that there is a point where all countries can no longer take anymore migrants, where financially, taking on more migrants will be detrimental to our own citizens