Should the EU impose a quota of migrants per country?

Yes, but it should be based off the percentage of the population to ensure every EU country houses their fair share

Under rare and extreme circumstances, quotas of migrants per country should be abolished

Even though I believe in Ireland taking in its fare share of migrants I believe the EU should be dispanded

Ireland should be able to control its own borders

Everyone should be allowed to come in. For Gods' sake did we not learn anything from the world wars?

The EU should not dictate a countries immigration policy.

No that should be up to each individual country.

i’m unsure

Percentage of government alone is incorrect which it does to dies and end the rules when the gives ok with New Zealand and Australia Indian include hard sri Lanka attack budget

That depends. I'd have to see it first before i can say yes or no.

NO oppinion

We should always help people who need it

That needs to be under review because we need to reform this sector because we cannot have mass migrant crises & yes we do need migrants but it needs to be limited & legal or we don't do this at all

Yes, but it should be adjusted accordingly to how many migrants need a safe home

Yes but they should prove they are coming to work and add value to the community

No, Doing so would be destructive to the EU and potentially lead to it disbanding.

Yes, but have the quota be a number that is hard to max

Yes, but this quota needs to be balanced and high enough to welcome everyone

No, but it should give funding to countries based on migrant numbers taken in.

It should be up to the individual countries themselves

Depends on the size of the country and the state the housing market is in.

Depending on the which country it is , how rich it is, if it can house them, if it is safe for them.

It should be based on a countries ability to accommodate them

the EU doesn't have a right to determine our decisions

No, however, every country within the EU should be required to share the burden of housing and caring for refugees. Countries within the EU should not be able to decline them when other EU countries are allowing them.

Yes, for economic migrants, not for asylum seekers

the eu as an entity should be abolished

Depending on how the country treats their own people - in the case of Ireland, its citizens are treated poorly. Those who are seeking a better life should not be subjected to living within direct provision for more than 8 years which is the case for some in Ireland.

No, the countries should make their own quotas.

I believe no in general but in some situations if a country barely has the resources to allow it’s own nationals to obtain their basic needs then there should be some form of quota .

This is an issue of sovereignty and it should be left to individual states

Each EU member state has a responsibility to take Migrants as a result of several on going events in the Middle East, Sahel, etc., though a model would be needed to evenly distribute these individuals. Some examples would be a nations current economy, the state of their housing, their ability to integrate migrants successfully, etc., etc.

No, but they should more or less be spread proportionately to host country population.

Based on financial situation and current population

There should be a minimum quota to make sure all countries are helping out as much as possible but it should be encouraged to accept more than the quota.

Yes, but only for refugees and with EU aid assistance.

Yes that will allow to control legal migrants into the UK

Yes, and a limit.

According to the law in each country Eu would not be impose a quota of migrants per country

No, each country should be able to decide their own.

No, but it should set a quota for acceptance of applications

that needs to be debated & reviewed because all of those countries & their laws

No, the EU should be deleted with no backup

No, and Ireland should leave the EU

No, Ireland should retain sovereignty over it's own immigration laws and introduce a points based system with deportations for law breakers, illegals even those who are first generation regardless of how long they've been here and those who overstay their visa.

How could the distribution of migrants across countries affect relationships between different nations?

How do you think a government should balance its responsibility to its citizens and to global humanitarian needs?

What are the moral implications of countries having to accept a certain number of migrants?

Would you support a migrant quota if it meant aiding those in desperate need or escaping conflict?