+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 635 Libertarian voters.

91%
Yes
9%
No
68%
Yes
7%
No
21%
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men
1%
No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger
2%
Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory
1%
No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat
0%
No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 635 Libertarian voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 635 Libertarian voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Libertarian voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9Z9CTH3answered…2wks2W

yes, but interventions and restructuring of the military should take place to mitigate the risk for sexual violence occurring

 @9Z9B9Y4answered…2wks2W

Yes as long as they can pass close to the same physical test as a man because in war there is no simplifications for a women not being able to carry as much or run as fast but I do believe women should be allowed

 @9NGMZLD answered…6mos6MO

Honestly, I don't think there should be a military at all, I don't think anyone of any gender should have to serve in a combat role

 @9H76M6Ganswered…12mos12MO

No combat, just peace for everyone. Otherwise, it's better to just let anyone who wants to join join and leave those who don't want to get involved alone

 @99V72GYanswered…2yrs2Y

Protection by women practice and given a doves which govern themselves is legal danger with men an womens private marriage certificate

 @99P372Ganswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as they can pass the necessary physical tests alike men, but suited to the overall abilities of women,

 @8ZRTRWJanswered…3yrs3Y