+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 134 Crumlin D voters.

96%
Yes
4%
No
83%
Yes
3%
No
11%
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men
1%
No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat
1%
Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory
0%
No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger
0%
No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 134 Crumlin D voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 134 Crumlin D voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Crumlin D voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZVFMH7answered…2mos2MO

Only women should be in combat roles to balance out historical gender inequality. Mandatory conscription too

 @9Z9CTH3answered…3mos3MO

yes, but interventions and restructuring of the military should take place to mitigate the risk for sexual violence occurring

 @9Z9B9Y4answered…3mos3MO

Yes as long as they can pass close to the same physical test as a man because in war there is no simplifications for a women not being able to carry as much or run as fast but I do believe women should be allowed

 @9NGMZLD answered…8mos8MO

Honestly, I don't think there should be a military at all, I don't think anyone of any gender should have to serve in a combat role

 @9H76M6Ganswered…1yr1Y

No combat, just peace for everyone. Otherwise, it's better to just let anyone who wants to join join and leave those who don't want to get involved alone

 @99V72GYanswered…2yrs2Y

Protection by women practice and given a doves which govern themselves is legal danger with men an womens private marriage certificate

 @99P372Ganswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, as long as they can pass the necessary physical tests alike men, but suited to the overall abilities of women,

 @8ZRTRWJanswered…3yrs3Y