Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › United States of Europe
8>8 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
8>8 Personal answerI don't know |
社会 › Hate Speech
8>8 Personal answerYes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech |
罪行 › Private Prisons
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 社会福利
8>8 Personal answer不需改变 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Fox Hunting
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
8>8 Personal answer不需要,这是浪费时间浪费金钱。 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
8>8 Personal answerYes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
8>8 Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
8>8 Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
8>8 Personal answerNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
移民 › 双重国籍
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Vaccine Passports
8>8 Personal answerYes, as long as they are not mandatory |
医保 › World Health Organization
8>8 Personal answerYes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
外交政策 › European Commission
8>8 Personal answerYes, and replaced with a more democratically accountable group |
国内政策 › 任期限制
8>8 Personal answer不 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
8>8 Personal answer不,太多富有的公民正在滥用海外银行法律的漏洞逃税 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
8>8 Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
8>8 Personal answer不 |
移民 › Migrant Children
8>8 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
8>8 Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
8>8 Personal answerNo, spend that money on improving infrastructure and the community to attract companies |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
8>8 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
8>8 Personal answerEach case must be accessed on an individual basis |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 10 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.