This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Ideology
Constituency
County
Region
Barony
Electoral Division
Response rates from 340 Coolock voters.
53% Yes |
47% No |
53% Yes |
47% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 340 Coolock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 340 Coolock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Coolock voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZMFKZC1wk1W
Only allow the technology once it has been thoroughly tested and proven to be safe against malfunctions or hacking
@9ZHJG9Y2wks2W
For partially abled drivers, technology developments are welcomed. If you can fully drive a car and still want more technology it is greed
@9ZHHRQC2wks2W
No, but there should be regulations designed to ensure public safety as advanced technology is added to vehicles.
@9ZH95KB2wks2W
I think that advanced tech can be used in a car but human control should take priority and advanced tech should only be used in certain situations.
@9ZG2CJ52wks2W
I don’t believe there should be a significant amount of time or money spent on this but I do believe AI and technological advancement may cause more harm than good in the long run, important to create attraction of human interaction and human perspectives. Protection of anthropological views is important
@9YMK7BN2wks2W
Auto pilot should not be allowed , everything else is okay. Electric cars should be more regulated
@9MZBM8X6mos6MO
To a degree, as over reliance on technology can lead to dependency
Join in on the most popular conversations.
