Crypto technology offers tools like payment, lending, borrowing, and saving to anyone with an internet connection. Proponents argue that stricter regulations would deter criminal use. Opponents argue that stricter crypto regulation would limit financial opportunities to citizens that are denied access to or can't afford the fees associated with traditional banking.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Response rates from 364 Naas voters.
51% Yes |
49% No |
45% Yes |
41% No |
7% Yes, the government should screen cryptocurrencies before circulation to ensure legitimate value and exchange rates |
4% No, and citizens should be allowed to protect their savings from reckless fiscal policies or subjugation |
0% Yes, and ban the use of crytocurrencies |
3% No, and underprivileged citizens deserve the same financial opportunities and services that traditional banks offer the wealthy |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 364 Naas voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 364 Naas voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Naas voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MNT9326mos6MO
Don’t know enough about this issue to have an opinion
@9ZGM5JV 1wk1W
cryptocurrencies have been used for shady things in the past. They are difficult to monitor therefore some regulation may be good.
@9ZD2GRX2wks2W
Government should only make sure that cryptocurrencies are legit and safe to use but shouldn't try enforce tax are be able to trace it.
@9ZCTZV62wks2W
Yes and the government should screen cryptocurrencies to ensure they are legitimate, and all holdings of crypto currencies should be counted as money and be taxed.
@9MY673N6mos6MO
No, regulations are in place and any person should be able to invest their money as they see fit
Join in on the most popular conversations.
