Taking a more active role in international conflicts involving human rights violations is meant to assert EU values globally. Proponents argue it is a moral obligation. Opponents fear it could entangle the EU in endless foreign conflicts and overextend its responsibilities.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Political party
Constituency
County
Region
Barony
Electoral Division
Response rates from 193 Coolock voters.
76% Yes |
24% No |
76% Yes |
24% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 193 Coolock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 193 Coolock voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Coolock voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZCJSX53wks3W
It should provide humanitarian aid while maintaining its military neutrality.
@9NSBV4S6mos6MO
No, the EU has shown that it can not speak on behalf of all EU member states
@9NN42LJ6mos6MO
Yes, regarding fostering peace talks. Caution is needed regarding direct conflict.
@9NL327N6mos6MO
Yes, but in terms of negotiating peace. Member states should be also aiming towards peace. It becomes more complicated when peace talks do not work - as is the case with Russia.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Human Rights” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.