+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 150 Rathmines West A voters.

11%
Yes
89%
No
11%
Yes
89%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 150 Rathmines West A voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 150 Rathmines West A voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Rathmines West A voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZGSPPYanswered…2mos2MO

If a woman had no embryos left except the ones she froze and they got damaged then Yes they would be considered HER children to be ... yet a life of a child is a conscious born one. So No also

 @9YM9F27answered…2mos2MO

It depends on the circumstances. If someone has frozen their eggs, eg due to illness, and upon going to begin retrieval they have been lost / destroyed, the individual whose eggs they are should be fairly compensated - especially if they are no longer in a position to produce their own.

 @9YM7NHXanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, as long as they're at the stage of developmnent where a brain has formed and is firing neurons.

 @9ZSJ628answered…2mos2MO

Create new idea of pre-birth status. Giving rights to frozen embryos but not considering them fully children

 @9ZS7DQ8answered…2mos2MO

Depends on the age of the embryo, for example an embryo lasts until week 10. I would have a much easier time considering a 10 week embryo a child to a 1 week old embryo.

 @9ZRNSY6answered…2mos2MO

Frozen Embryos should be treated as a major personal asset and protected under law, but is not a child.

 @9ZHTGD6 answered…2mos2MO

If embryos were frozen by a patient then there is an intent to have a child, therefore should be treated as such.