+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 520 Green Party voters.

2%
Yes
97%
No
2%
Yes
97%
No

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 520 Green Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 520 Green Party voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Green Party voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZGSPPYanswered…3mos3MO

If a woman had no embryos left except the ones she froze and they got damaged then Yes they would be considered HER children to be ... yet a life of a child is a conscious born one. So No also

 @9YM9F27answered…3mos3MO

It depends on the circumstances. If someone has frozen their eggs, eg due to illness, and upon going to begin retrieval they have been lost / destroyed, the individual whose eggs they are should be fairly compensated - especially if they are no longer in a position to produce their own.

 @9YM7NHXanswered…3mos3MO

Yes, as long as they're at the stage of developmnent where a brain has formed and is firing neurons.

 @9ZSJ628answered…2mos2MO

Create new idea of pre-birth status. Giving rights to frozen embryos but not considering them fully children

 @9ZS7DQ8answered…2mos2MO

Depends on the age of the embryo, for example an embryo lasts until week 10. I would have a much easier time considering a 10 week embryo a child to a 1 week old embryo.

 @9ZRNSY6answered…2mos2MO

Frozen Embryos should be treated as a major personal asset and protected under law, but is not a child.

 @9ZHTGD6 answered…3mos3MO

If embryos were frozen by a patient then there is an intent to have a child, therefore should be treated as such.