+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 627 Uppercross voters.

60%
Yes
40%
No
41%
Yes
40%
No
13%
Yes, but require the labelling of foods that are genetically modified
5%
Yes, but producers should not be able to patent seeds

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 627 Uppercross voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 627 Uppercross voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Uppercross voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZHHRQCanswered…2wks2W

Yes, provided there are government regulations for how crops and foods can be modified, along with labelling of modified foods that includes how and why the specific foods in question have been modified.

 @9ZCTZV6answered…2wks2W

Yes, but only if the food is clearly labelled as a gmo, when it's nutrient value and overall quality is at least as beneficial as its non altered counterpart, and when it has been proven that the specific alteration will cause no harm to us.

 @9K69C72answered…9mos9MO

no i dont support this as GMO crops and foods have MRNa and turbo cancers that are desinged specifically for population redution

 @9HBTP3Fanswered…12mos12MO

Only for cisgenic breeding or those which could have been accomplished through conventional methods.

 @9H76M6Ganswered…1yr1Y

In terms of helping people who struggle with the intake of certain foods and vitamins and stuff, yes. Both be nice to nature and don't replace everything

 @9BZBGT9answered…2yrs2Y

Yes but only where organic alternatives (such as meat) cannot be produced at a sustainable level. In this case labelling of these foods needs to be mandated, as well as a limit to the additives etc being included in the product.