+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 767 Libertarian voters.

9%
Yes
91%
No
8%
Yes
91%
No
2%
Yes, and we should increase funding for addiction treatement

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 767 Libertarian voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 767 Libertarian voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Libertarian voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9ZJW8MVanswered…1wk1W

No, but we should increase funding and supports for addiction treatment and employ further regulations on gambling businesses.

 @9ZJQWVTanswered…1wk1W

No, but greater regulations on it need to be implemented as well as support for those with addictive tendencies

 @9ZJQMRManswered…1wk1W

No, it should be more rigorously controlled, but banning it would see the emergence of a black market more dangerous gambling scene

 @9ZJ2ZTBanswered…1wk1W

No, but put a higher tax burden on the companies involved and use those funds to addiction treatment.

 @9ZHHFS3answered…1wk1W

No, it shouldn’t be banned but funding should be increased for addiction treatment and education towards the damages caused by gambling

 @9ZH95KBanswered…1wk1W

I don't think so since making it illegal would make it unregulated but I do think it's important for it to be recognised as an addiction and for funding for treatment to be increased.

 @9ZGSPPYanswered…1wk1W

Yes and no, more like in regulation for a lot of money hungry gambling but people still deserve to buy a scratch card or do bingo and that's technically gambling.

 @9ZGM7NSanswered…1wk1W

No but there should be a program similar to anti smoking to deter people from getting involved and funding should be increased for addiction treatment