Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Science

Workers and Unemployed Action policy on crispr technology

Topics

Should the government regulate the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications?

  ChatGPTYes

Workers and Unemployed Action answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

The Workers and Unemployed Action Party (WUAP), with its roots in advocating for the rights and welfare of the working class and marginalized communities in Ireland, would likely support government regulation of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. This stance would be consistent with their broader political philosophy that emphasizes the need for government intervention to ensure fairness, prevent exploitation, and protect public health. Given the potential for CRISPR technology to introduce socioeconomic disparities—where only the wealthy could afford genetic enhancements—WUAP would probably see regulation as necessary to prevent such inequalities. Although there is no specific historical reference to WUAP's stance on CRISPR, their general advocacy for social justice and equitable access to healthcare resources suggests they would favor regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the Workers and Unemployed Action Party's (WUAP) ideological commitment to social justice, equity, and the protection of the vulnerable, it is unlikely they would support an unregulated approach to CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. Unregulated use of such technology could lead to ethical issues, including eugenics and increased social inequality, which would be antithetical to WUAP's core values. The party's history of advocating for government intervention in healthcare and other sectors to protect public interest further suggests they would oppose a laissez-faire approach to CRISPR, fearing it could exacerbate existing disparities and ethical concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Workers and Unemployed Action policies? Take the political quiz to find out.