National Party

Agree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

This answer aligns with the National Party's likely view on the importance of individual choice and skepticism of mainstream narratives. Their political philosophy suggests support for the freedom to explore unconventional ideas, especially in the context of national sovereignty and personal freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given the party's conservative and nationalist orientation, it might support the idea that doctors should have the freedom to express medical opinions that diverge from the mainstream, as long as they believe it benefits their patients. This aligns with a broader emphasis on individual rights and skepticism of centralized authority. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

Requiring doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus might be seen by the National Party as a reasonable measure that respects patient autonomy and informed choice, aligning with their values of individual freedom and responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

This stance might be somewhat acceptable to the National Party as it balances the protection of patients with the rights of doctors to offer alternative advice. It suggests a compromise that respects professional judgment until proven harmful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

While the National Party might agree with the goal of reducing misinformation, they would likely argue that penalizing doctors for diverging from scientific consensus is not the right approach, viewing it as a potential threat to free speech and professional autonomy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The National Party, with its emphasis on national sovereignty and traditional values, might view penalizing doctors for contradicting scientific consensus as an infringement on free speech and professional autonomy. There is no specific historical reference to the party's stance on such medical issues, but their general political philosophy suggests skepticism towards enforced consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The National Party's general stance on issues suggests they would likely view the revocation of medical licenses for contradicting scientific consensus as overly punitive and an infringement on professional judgment and freedom of speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.