Try the political quiz

445 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

 @9MHCQW7disagreed…9mos9MO

It’s a little bit too harsh considering a person has the autonomy to choose what they do with their body. However I do agree if the doctor is negligently promoting a dangerous procedure despite other safer alternatives that should be penalised.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

 @9MHCQW7agreed…9mos9MO

If there’s no harm done why should one be penalised? A person should have the ultimate right to choose what they want to do with their body after they consider the merits of all options.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

 @B27KT34from Georgia  answered…1mo1MO

No, but doctors has to disclose it and in addition to that, they should only lose their license if it's proven to harm the patient.

 @9ZTZ4P5answered…2mos2MO

Doctor should be giving factual advice and should provide correct information to the patient and not have a bias / opinion on their condition

 @9ZRFRY4answered…2mos2MO

Yes, in issues where there is a clear consensus and the doctor should lose their medical license. However, for issues where a method or process is new and still being investigated and discovered, they should only be penalized if it is not disclosed that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

What if a treatment worked for you but is not widely accepted by the scientific community, should the doctor be penalized for recommending it?

 @9Z997FSSocial Democratsanswered…3mos3MO

No, but only after first providing health advice in line with contemporary scientific consensus.

 @9NPQ5W6 answered…8mos8MO

 @99LBZB6answered…2yrs2Y

Sometimes a good doctor will not only know an old remedy but also when it can be prescribed appropriately.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Should doctors who disagree with prevalent scientific consensus have a platform to express their views, and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How might punishing doctors for their advice affect the patient-doctor trust relationship?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

If a doctor's advice based on old scientific beliefs harms a patient, who should be held responsible?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Should a doctor's personal beliefs influence the health advice they give to their patients?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How would you feel if a doctor gave you health advice that later turned out to be incorrect?

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2yrs2Y

No, this limits medical debate and freedom of speech

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Should there be a line drawn between freedom of speech and professional responsibility in healthcare, and where would you draw it?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

How do you think spreading unverified medical information by a professional could affect public health?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

Can you think of a time when the 'scientific consensus' was wrong and how that impacts your view on this issue?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…1yr1Y

In your opinion, how can a balance be maintained between innovation in medicine and adhering to established scientific facts?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...