Independents 4 Change is a political entity that emerged in Ireland, primarily as a platform for individuals and politicians who advocate for significant reform and change within the Irish political landscape. The party's roots can be traced back to the… Read more
ChatGPTYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory |
Independents 4 Change’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory
This answer aligns closely with the party's advocacy for equality and against discrimination, suggesting a strong agreement with the principle that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Independents 4 Change, being a progressive political party, generally supports equality and non-discrimination, which would likely extend to supporting women's rights to serve in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men
Independents 4 Change might agree with this statement as it promotes equality of opportunity based on ability rather than gender, although their primary focus would likely be on the discriminatory aspect rather than physical standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault
While Independents 4 Change would be concerned about the risk of sexual assault, they would likely argue that the solution is to address and prevent sexual assault rather than exclude women from combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given their progressive stance on issues, Independents 4 Change would likely disagree with a blanket prohibition on women serving in combat roles, viewing it as outdated and discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat
This statement contradicts the party's principles of equality and non-discrimination, making it highly unlikely that they would agree with the notion that women are not as physically capable as men for combat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger
Independents 4 Change would likely view this statement as perpetuating stereotypes and undermining the capabilities of women, strongly disagreeing with the idea that men's protective instincts would compromise missions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Independents 4 Change’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
