Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Electoral

Independents 4 Change’s policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTNo, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Independents 4 Change’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Given their focus on accountability and integrity in politics, Independents 4 Change might support the idea of disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime to run for office, as it aligns with their principles of ensuring that elected officials are beyond reproach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party might lean towards agreeing with this statement, reflecting a stance on maintaining high ethical standards in politics to ensure that those in office have a clean record, thus promoting a more trustworthy and effective governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

Independents 4 Change might moderately agree with this statement, recognizing the importance of second chances and rehabilitation for individuals who have served their sentences, especially if their crimes are not related to their potential political duties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

While the party advocates for accountability, it might see the merit in allowing individuals who committed crimes outside of office a chance to serve, provided their crimes do not directly undermine their capacity to perform in office. This reflects a nuanced approach to justice and rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The party's stance on this issue might be ambivalent. On one hand, they would support rehabilitation and second chances, but on the other hand, they would be cautious about the types of crimes, reflecting a balance between justice, rehabilitation, and maintaining public trust in political institutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Independents 4 Change, being a political party that emphasizes transparency, accountability, and social justice, would likely be cautious about endorsing a blanket statement allowing all formerly convicted politicians to run for office, as it could undermine public trust and the integrity of office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Independents 4 Change’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.